[aerogear-dev] [webpush] Message Encryption for Web Push

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[aerogear-dev] [webpush] Message Encryption for Web Push

Idel Pivnitskiy
Hi all,

Today WebPush WG released a new draft of Message Encryption for Web Push [1]. The changes are not significant. This draft clarifies behavior of encryption and decryption for push messages, which are longer then 4096 octets. For more information, see difference of two versions [2].

[1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-encryption-01.txt

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] [webpush] Message Encryption for Web Push

Matthias Wessendorf
Hi Idel,

thanks for sharing!

Just wondering - do you know if there are any updates planed on the Web Push draft itself ? 

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Today WebPush WG released a new draft of Message Encryption for Web Push [1]. The changes are not significant. This draft clarifies behavior of encryption and decryption for push messages, which are longer then 4096 octets. For more information, see difference of two versions [2].

[1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-encryption-01.txt

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] [webpush] Message Encryption for Web Push

Idel Pivnitskiy
Not now.

Shida Schubert (one of WG cochairs) announced a poll for adoption of current draft [1] as WG item (as a starting point for working on the only milestone for the WG) until next Wednesday (Jul 10th). For more info, see this thread [2].
Also, Martin Thomson added some small clarifications for the current draft [3].

Btw, Google works on WebPush too. Hope, Chrome will support it soon.


Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

2015-07-03 10:37 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]>:
Hi Idel,

thanks for sharing!

Just wondering - do you know if there are any updates planed on the Web Push draft itself ? 

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Today WebPush WG released a new draft of Message Encryption for Web Push [1]. The changes are not significant. This draft clarifies behavior of encryption and decryption for push messages, which are longer then 4096 octets. For more information, see difference of two versions [2].

[1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-encryption-01.txt

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] [webpush] Message Encryption for Web Push

Matthias Wessendorf


On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <[hidden email]> wrote:
Not now.

Shida Schubert (one of WG cochairs) announced a poll for adoption of current draft [1] as WG item (as a starting point for working on the only milestone for the WG) until next Wednesday (Jul 10th). For more info, see this thread [2].
Also, Martin Thomson added some small clarifications for the current draft [3].

Btw, Google works on WebPush too. Hope, Chrome will support it soon.

Are they working on the actual wire-protocol? Or are they just on the client side, meaning the JS APIs for WebPush?

I think their current focus is using GCM behind the WebPush standard APIs (some more context [1]). 


 


Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

2015-07-03 10:37 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]>:
Hi Idel,

thanks for sharing!

Just wondering - do you know if there are any updates planed on the Web Push draft itself ? 

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Today WebPush WG released a new draft of Message Encryption for Web Push [1]. The changes are not significant. This draft clarifies behavior of encryption and decryption for push messages, which are longer then 4096 octets. For more information, see difference of two versions [2].

[1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-encryption-01.txt

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] [webpush] Message Encryption for Web Push

Idel Pivnitskiy
I heard it from Chromium team, so I think that they are working on client side for web browser.
Will ask them for more information.

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

2015-07-03 13:34 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]>:


On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <[hidden email]> wrote:
Not now.

Shida Schubert (one of WG cochairs) announced a poll for adoption of current draft [1] as WG item (as a starting point for working on the only milestone for the WG) until next Wednesday (Jul 10th). For more info, see this thread [2].
Also, Martin Thomson added some small clarifications for the current draft [3].

Btw, Google works on WebPush too. Hope, Chrome will support it soon.

Are they working on the actual wire-protocol? Or are they just on the client side, meaning the JS APIs for WebPush?

I think their current focus is using GCM behind the WebPush standard APIs (some more context [1]). 


 


Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

2015-07-03 10:37 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]>:
Hi Idel,

thanks for sharing!

Just wondering - do you know if there are any updates planed on the Web Push draft itself ? 

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Today WebPush WG released a new draft of Message Encryption for Web Push [1]. The changes are not significant. This draft clarifies behavior of encryption and decryption for push messages, which are longer then 4096 octets. For more information, see difference of two versions [2].

[1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-encryption-01.txt

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] [webpush] Message Encryption for Web Push

Luke Holmquist


On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <[hidden email]> wrote:
I heard it from Chromium team, so I think that they are working on client side for web browser.
Will ask them for more information.

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

2015-07-03 13:34 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]>:


On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <[hidden email]> wrote:
Not now.

Shida Schubert (one of WG cochairs) announced a poll for adoption of current draft [1] as WG item (as a starting point for working on the only milestone for the WG) until next Wednesday (Jul 10th). For more info, see this thread [2].
Also, Martin Thomson added some small clarifications for the current draft [3].

Btw, Google works on WebPush too. Hope, Chrome will support it soon.

Are they working on the actual wire-protocol? Or are they just on the client side, meaning the JS APIs for WebPush?

I think their current focus is using GCM behind the WebPush standard APIs (some more context [1]). 




in this section "Future of Push Messaging on Chrome and the Open Web" they talk about eventually moving to the Web Push Protocol 
 


Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

2015-07-03 10:37 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]>:
Hi Idel,

thanks for sharing!

Just wondering - do you know if there are any updates planed on the Web Push draft itself ? 

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Idel Pivnitskiy <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi all,

Today WebPush WG released a new draft of Message Encryption for Web Push [1]. The changes are not significant. This draft clarifies behavior of encryption and decryption for push messages, which are longer then 4096 octets. For more information, see difference of two versions [2].

[1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-webpush-encryption-01.txt

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
-- 

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev




_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev