[aerogear-dev] release versioning

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[aerogear-dev] release versioning

Matthias Wessendorf
hi,

our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1


But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?

NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
(later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
you would call it).

thoughts?

-M

--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] release versioning

Bruno Oliveira
Hi my friend on aerogear-controller and aerogear-security before the release of M6 on aerogear, we did something like this:

0.0.1.M6, 0.0.2.M6

But now I'm planning (must to be discussed with qmx and Daniel) to follow the roadmap strictly and release our snapshots with the release ID (M1) from controller and not aerogear (M7). I'd like to have something like: 0.0.1.M1….and 1 release per week.

The reason for 0.0.1 is because ag-security is not mature enough to be 1.0.0, in my opinion.


-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

On Monday, October 29, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

hi,

our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1


But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?

NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
(later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
you would call it).

thoughts?

-M

--
Matthias Wessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
qmx
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] release versioning

qmx
Administrator
In reply to this post by Matthias Wessendorf
Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible :)

Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029

thoughts?

On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

> hi,
>
> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>
>
> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>
> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
> you would call it).
>
> thoughts?
>
> -M
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-- qmx


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
qmx
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] release versioning

qmx
Administrator
In reply to this post by Bruno Oliveira
for the security part we probably need to stick to the same versioning strategy adopted to the rest of the subprojects 1.0.0.{Alpha,M1..Mn,CR,Final}

you can have as many Milestone releases as you wish - they aren't considered stable too :)

I kinda miss the 0.0.x versioning, but makes more sense to align with the rest :P

On Oct 29, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:

> Hi my friend on aerogear-controller and aerogear-security before the release of M6 on aerogear, we did something like this:
>
> 0.0.1.M6, 0.0.2.M6
>
> But now I'm planning (must to be discussed with qmx and Daniel) to follow the roadmap strictly and release our snapshots with the release ID (M1) from controller and not aerogear (M7). I'd like to have something like: 0.0.1.M1….and 1 release per week.
>
> The reason for 0.0.1 is because ag-security is not mature enough to be 1.0.0, in my opinion.
>
>
> --
> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
> -
> @abstractj
> -
> Volenti Nihil Difficile
> On Monday, October 29, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>>
>>
>> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
>> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>>
>> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
>> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
>> you would call it).
>>
>> thoughts?
>>
>> -M
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

-- qmx


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] release versioning

Matthias Wessendorf
In reply to this post by qmx
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Douglas Campos <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible :)

well... I appreciate them :-) especially when they build are using
timestamp endings ;)

>
> Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029

I don't mind to do regular "dev release", so I am also in fav. of a
timestamp-ish version

-M

>
> thoughts?
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>>
>>
>> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
>> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>>
>> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
>> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
>> you would call it).
>>
>> thoughts?
>>
>> -M
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> -- qmx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] release versioning

Bruno Oliveira
+1 Let's do it.


-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

On Monday, October 29, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Douglas Campos <[hidden email]> wrote:
Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible :)

well... I appreciate them :-) especially when they build are using
timestamp endings ;)


Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029

I don't mind to do regular "dev release", so I am also in fav. of a
timestamp-ish version

-M


thoughts?

On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

hi,

our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1


But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?

NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
(later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
you would call it).

thoughts?

-M

--
Matthias Wessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list

-- qmx


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list



--
Matthias Wessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] release versioning

Matthias Wessendorf
<3

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Bruno Oliveira <[hidden email]> wrote:

> +1 Let's do it.
>
>
> --
> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
> -
> @abstractj
> -
> Volenti Nihil Difficile
>
> On Monday, October 29, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Douglas Campos <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible :)
>
>
> well... I appreciate them :-) especially when they build are using
> timestamp endings ;)
>
>
> Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, I'd say
> do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
>
>
> I don't mind to do regular "dev release", so I am also in fav. of a
> timestamp-ish version
>
> -M
>
>
> thoughts?
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>
>
> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>
> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
> you would call it).
>
> thoughts?
>
> -M
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> -- qmx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] release versioning

Rodney Russ
In reply to this post by qmx

----- "Douglas Campos" <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible
> :)
>
> Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods,
> I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
>
> thoughts?

There is a discussion of timestamping milestone releases here:

https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning

>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
> >
> >
> > But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
> > often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
> >
> > NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
> > (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what
> ever
> > you would call it).
> >
> > thoughts?
> >
> > -M
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> -- qmx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] release versioning

Jay Balunas

On Oct 29, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Rodney Russ wrote:

>
> ----- "Douglas Campos" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible
>> :)
>>
>> Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods,
>> I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
>>
>> thoughts?
>
> There is a discussion of timestamping milestone releases here:
>
> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning

+1 on 1.0.0.M1-857337463  timestamp versions for rapid dev releases.

>
>>
>> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>>>
>>>
>>> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
>>> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>>>
>>> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
>>> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what
>> ever
>>> you would call it).
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>> -M
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>> -- qmx
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] release versioning

Matthias Wessendorf
kk

thanks for the feedback, guys!

-M

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Jay Balunas <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Rodney Russ wrote:
>
>>
>> ----- "Douglas Campos" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible
>>> :)
>>>
>>> Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods,
>>> I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>
>> There is a discussion of timestamping milestone releases here:
>>
>> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning
>
> +1 on 1.0.0.M1-857337463  timestamp versions for rapid dev releases.
>
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
>>>> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
>>>> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what
>>> ever
>>>> you would call it).
>>>>
>>>> thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -M
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>> -- qmx
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev