Quantcast

[aerogear-dev] UPS: Deleting 1.0.x branch ?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[aerogear-dev] UPS: Deleting 1.0.x branch ?

Matthias Wessendorf
Hi,

the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3.

Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch.

That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this branch..


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS: Deleting 1.0.x branch ?

cvasilak


On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3.

Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch.

+1
 

That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this branch..

makes sense
 

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS: Deleting 1.0.x branch ?

Sebastien Blanc
+1

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Christos Vasilakis <[hidden email]> wrote:


On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3.

Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch.

+1
 

That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this branch..

makes sense
 

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS: Deleting 1.0.x branch ?

Lukas Fryc
+1

st 15. 4. 2015 v 8:47 odesílatel Sebastien Blanc <[hidden email]> napsal:
+1

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Christos Vasilakis <[hidden email]> wrote:


On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3.

Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch.

+1
 

That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this branch..

makes sense
 

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
qmx
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS: Deleting 1.0.x branch ?

qmx
Administrator
In reply to this post by Matthias Wessendorf

+1

On Apr 15, 2015 3:38 AM, "Matthias Wessendorf" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3.

Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch.

That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this branch..


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS: Deleting 1.0.x branch ?

Luke Holmquist
do it

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Douglas Campos <[hidden email]> wrote:

+1

On Apr 15, 2015 3:38 AM, "Matthias Wessendorf" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3.

Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch.

That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this branch..


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS: Deleting 1.0.x branch ?

Matthias Wessendorf
adios and good bye!

Branch deleted

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Luke Holmquist <[hidden email]> wrote:
do it

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Douglas Campos <[hidden email]> wrote:

+1

On Apr 15, 2015 3:38 AM, "Matthias Wessendorf" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

the 1.0.x line is put to bed, and we have a tag for 1.0.3.

Since there is no plan to have a 1.0.4, I'd propose deleting this branch.

That said, if there is a need for a 1.0.4 (e.g. security issues), we can branch of the 1.0.3 tag, therefore I see no sense in maintaining this branch..


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Loading...