[aerogear-dev] Too many branches in upstream

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[aerogear-dev] Too many branches in upstream

Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo
Hi,

I see that there are loads of branches pushed to the upstream repo that IMO shouldn't be there. I think branches should always belong to the forks, below is the list.

Apart from 1.1.x-dev and master I would like to delete all branches, specially the ones that are 2 years old!

What do you think about this?
  
Remote branches:
    1.1.4.Final-rhmap-13.11                tracked
    1.1.x-dev                              tracked
    AGPUSH-1047                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1149_enable_direct_access_grant tracked
    AGPUSH-1299                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1368                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1368-CherryPick                 tracked
    AGPUSH-1567                            tracked
    AGPUSH-2049                            tracked
    BOM_updates                            tracked
    DIST_update                            tracked
    FLAT_METRICS_1                         tracked
    GSOC_2017_kafka                        tracked
    JDK8                                   tracked
    KC_master_package_renamed              tracked
    LatestParent                           tracked
    Logger                                 tracked
    SenderSnippetUpdates                   tracked
    dimitraz-patch-1                       tracked
    firefox-variant                        tracked
    gcm-topics                             tracked
    hibernate.hbm2ddl                      tracked
    jms-batching                           tracked
    kafka-readme                           tracked
    kafka-readme-1                         tracked
    kc_isolated                            tracked
    master                                 tracked
    pr-template                            tracked
    readme_apns_http/2                     tracked
    release-1.1.0                          tracked
    safari-push                            tracked
    ux-revamp                              tracked
    webpush-variant                        tracked
    wizard_typop                           tracked

Cheers,

JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO

ASSOCIATE QE, mobile

Red Hat 

<span href="tel:+34618488633">M: +34618488633    


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] Too many branches in upstream

Matthias Wessendorf
Sure, go ahead!

usually a PR is only made from your own fork ;-) but sometimes that is not always followed rule, but it should be deleted if no longer needed...
However, please keep the "GSOC_2017_kafka" branch, besides the already mentioned branches.  

Let's see what other say

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I see that there are loads of branches pushed to the upstream repo that IMO shouldn't be there. I think branches should always belong to the forks, below is the list.

Apart from 1.1.x-dev and master I would like to delete all branches, specially the ones that are 2 years old!

What do you think about this?
  
Remote branches:
    1.1.4.Final-rhmap-13.11                tracked
    1.1.x-dev                              tracked
    AGPUSH-1047                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1149_enable_direct_access_grant tracked
    AGPUSH-1299                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1368                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1368-CherryPick                 tracked
    AGPUSH-1567                            tracked
    AGPUSH-2049                            tracked
    BOM_updates                            tracked
    DIST_update                            tracked
    FLAT_METRICS_1                         tracked
    GSOC_2017_kafka                        tracked
    JDK8                                   tracked
    KC_master_package_renamed              tracked
    LatestParent                           tracked
    Logger                                 tracked
    SenderSnippetUpdates                   tracked
    dimitraz-patch-1                       tracked
    firefox-variant                        tracked
    gcm-topics                             tracked
    hibernate.hbm2ddl                      tracked
    jms-batching                           tracked
    kafka-readme                           tracked
    kafka-readme-1                         tracked
    kc_isolated                            tracked
    master                                 tracked
    pr-template                            tracked
    readme_apns_http/2                     tracked
    release-1.1.0                          tracked
    safari-push                            tracked
    ux-revamp                              tracked
    webpush-variant                        tracked
    wizard_typop                           tracked

Cheers,

JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO

ASSOCIATE QE, mobile

Red Hat 

<span href="tel:+34618488633">M: +34618488633    


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] Too many branches in upstream

Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo
Thanks Matthias, I will do it in the afternoon to leave some time for the rest, just in case.

JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO

ASSOCIATE QE, mobile

Red Hat 

<span href="tel:+34618488633">M: +34618488633    


On 5 October 2017 at 09:18, Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]> wrote:
Sure, go ahead!

usually a PR is only made from your own fork ;-) but sometimes that is not always followed rule, but it should be deleted if no longer needed...
However, please keep the "GSOC_2017_kafka" branch, besides the already mentioned branches.  

Let's see what other say

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I see that there are loads of branches pushed to the upstream repo that IMO shouldn't be there. I think branches should always belong to the forks, below is the list.

Apart from 1.1.x-dev and master I would like to delete all branches, specially the ones that are 2 years old!

What do you think about this?
  
Remote branches:
    1.1.4.Final-rhmap-13.11                tracked
    1.1.x-dev                              tracked
    AGPUSH-1047                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1149_enable_direct_access_grant tracked
    AGPUSH-1299                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1368                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1368-CherryPick                 tracked
    AGPUSH-1567                            tracked
    AGPUSH-2049                            tracked
    BOM_updates                            tracked
    DIST_update                            tracked
    FLAT_METRICS_1                         tracked
    GSOC_2017_kafka                        tracked
    JDK8                                   tracked
    KC_master_package_renamed              tracked
    LatestParent                           tracked
    Logger                                 tracked
    SenderSnippetUpdates                   tracked
    dimitraz-patch-1                       tracked
    firefox-variant                        tracked
    gcm-topics                             tracked
    hibernate.hbm2ddl                      tracked
    jms-batching                           tracked
    kafka-readme                           tracked
    kafka-readme-1                         tracked
    kc_isolated                            tracked
    master                                 tracked
    pr-template                            tracked
    readme_apns_http/2                     tracked
    release-1.1.0                          tracked
    safari-push                            tracked
    ux-revamp                              tracked
    webpush-variant                        tracked
    wizard_typop                           tracked

Cheers,

JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO

ASSOCIATE QE, mobile

Red Hat 

<span href="tel:+34618488633">M: +34618488633    


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] Too many branches in upstream

Matthias Wessendorf
sweet! Thanks for stepping in, and volunteering the clean up ! 

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thanks Matthias, I will do it in the afternoon to leave some time for the rest, just in case.

JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO

ASSOCIATE QE, mobile

Red Hat 

<span href="tel:+34618488633">M: +34618488633    


On 5 October 2017 at 09:18, Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]> wrote:
Sure, go ahead!

usually a PR is only made from your own fork ;-) but sometimes that is not always followed rule, but it should be deleted if no longer needed...
However, please keep the "GSOC_2017_kafka" branch, besides the already mentioned branches.  

Let's see what other say

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I see that there are loads of branches pushed to the upstream repo that IMO shouldn't be there. I think branches should always belong to the forks, below is the list.

Apart from 1.1.x-dev and master I would like to delete all branches, specially the ones that are 2 years old!

What do you think about this?
  
Remote branches:
    1.1.4.Final-rhmap-13.11                tracked
    1.1.x-dev                              tracked
    AGPUSH-1047                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1149_enable_direct_access_grant tracked
    AGPUSH-1299                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1368                            tracked
    AGPUSH-1368-CherryPick                 tracked
    AGPUSH-1567                            tracked
    AGPUSH-2049                            tracked
    BOM_updates                            tracked
    DIST_update                            tracked
    FLAT_METRICS_1                         tracked
    GSOC_2017_kafka                        tracked
    JDK8                                   tracked
    KC_master_package_renamed              tracked
    LatestParent                           tracked
    Logger                                 tracked
    SenderSnippetUpdates                   tracked
    dimitraz-patch-1                       tracked
    firefox-variant                        tracked
    gcm-topics                             tracked
    hibernate.hbm2ddl                      tracked
    jms-batching                           tracked
    kafka-readme                           tracked
    kafka-readme-1                         tracked
    kc_isolated                            tracked
    master                                 tracked
    pr-template                            tracked
    readme_apns_http/2                     tracked
    release-1.1.0                          tracked
    safari-push                            tracked
    ux-revamp                              tracked
    webpush-variant                        tracked
    wizard_typop                           tracked

Cheers,

JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO

ASSOCIATE QE, mobile

Red Hat 

<span href="tel:+34618488633">M: +34618488633    


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev