[aerogear-dev] AG JS JIRA

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[aerogear-dev] AG JS JIRA

Luke Holmquist
Hello all,

we've decided that it would probably be a good idea to move JIRA's related to the node-sender to the AG-JS JIRA instead of having them on the AGUSH JIRA.

i think this makes a bit more sense since this a javascript component.

I've started to move open JIRA's over.  i think i'll probably just leave the existing JIRA's where they are, unless someone feels strongly.


I've also started to create some "component" versions similar to the other projects.

the main JS lib will still be just numbers, like 2.3.0,  and for the node-sender we will now have node-sender-0.8.0, for example


-Luke

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] AG JS JIRA

Bruno Oliveira
+1 makes more sense

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Luke Holmquist <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello all,

we've decided that it would probably be a good idea to move JIRA's related to the node-sender to the AG-JS JIRA instead of having them on the AGUSH JIRA.

i think this makes a bit more sense since this a javascript component.

I've started to move open JIRA's over.  i think i'll probably just leave the existing JIRA's where they are, unless someone feels strongly.


I've also started to create some "component" versions similar to the other projects.

the main JS lib will still be just numbers, like 2.3.0,  and for the node-sender we will now have node-sender-0.8.0, for example


-Luke

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] AG JS JIRA

Daniel Passos
+1

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Oliveira <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 makes more sense

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Luke Holmquist <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello all,

we've decided that it would probably be a good idea to move JIRA's related to the node-sender to the AG-JS JIRA instead of having them on the AGUSH JIRA.

i think this makes a bit more sense since this a javascript component.

I've started to move open JIRA's over.  i think i'll probably just leave the existing JIRA's where they are, unless someone feels strongly.


I've also started to create some "component" versions similar to the other projects.

the main JS lib will still be just numbers, like 2.3.0,  and for the node-sender we will now have node-sender-0.8.0, for example


-Luke

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
-- Passos

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] AG JS JIRA

danielbevenius
+1 Sounds good

On 15 July 2015 at 22:52, Daniel Passos <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Oliveira <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 makes more sense

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Luke Holmquist <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello all,

we've decided that it would probably be a good idea to move JIRA's related to the node-sender to the AG-JS JIRA instead of having them on the AGUSH JIRA.

i think this makes a bit more sense since this a javascript component.

I've started to move open JIRA's over.  i think i'll probably just leave the existing JIRA's where they are, unless someone feels strongly.


I've also started to create some "component" versions similar to the other projects.

the main JS lib will still be just numbers, like 2.3.0,  and for the node-sender we will now have node-sender-0.8.0, for example


-Luke

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
-- Passos

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] AG JS JIRA

Matthias Wessendorf
word up👍

On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Daniel Bevenius <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 Sounds good

On 15 July 2015 at 22:52, Daniel Passos <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;dpassos@redhat.com&#39;);" target="_blank">dpassos@...> wrote:
+1

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Oliveira <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;bruno@abstractj.org&#39;);" target="_blank">bruno@...> wrote:
+1 makes more sense

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Luke Holmquist <<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;lholmqui@redhat.com&#39;);" target="_blank">lholmqui@...> wrote:
Hello all,

we've decided that it would probably be a good idea to move JIRA's related to the node-sender to the AG-JS JIRA instead of having them on the AGUSH JIRA.

i think this makes a bit more sense since this a javascript component.

I've started to move open JIRA's over.  i think i'll probably just leave the existing JIRA's where they are, unless someone feels strongly.


I've also started to create some "component" versions similar to the other projects.

the main JS lib will still be just numbers, like 2.3.0,  and for the node-sender we will now have node-sender-0.8.0, for example


-Luke

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org&#39;);" target="_blank">aerogear-dev@...
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org&#39;);" target="_blank">aerogear-dev@...
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
-- Passos

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org&#39;);" target="_blank">aerogear-dev@...
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Sent from Gmail Mobile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] AG JS JIRA

Lukas Fryc
I know there already  is strong agreement, but my $0.02:

I'm not convinced about AGJS and connection with server-side libraries.


I feel like AGIOS, AGDROID, AGCORDOVA, AGJS are trackers for client-side libs,

AGPUSH, AGSYNC, are trackes for server-side technologies,


consider this use case: if we build eventually a new server-side Swift node-sender library, we won't track it under AGIOS because Swift comes from iOS land.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]> wrote:
word up👍


On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Daniel Bevenius <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 Sounds good

On 15 July 2015 at 22:52, Daniel Passos <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Oliveira <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 makes more sense

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Luke Holmquist <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello all,

we've decided that it would probably be a good idea to move JIRA's related to the node-sender to the AG-JS JIRA instead of having them on the AGUSH JIRA.

i think this makes a bit more sense since this a javascript component.

I've started to move open JIRA's over.  i think i'll probably just leave the existing JIRA's where they are, unless someone feels strongly.


I've also started to create some "component" versions similar to the other projects.

the main JS lib will still be just numbers, like 2.3.0,  and for the node-sender we will now have node-sender-0.8.0, for example


-Luke

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
-- Passos

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Sent from Gmail Mobile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] AG JS JIRA

Matthias Wessendorf
well... the use of components makes it easy - and for versions we could even do something like, for instance in AGJS

node-1.2.0
store-0.7.0

etc



On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Lukáš Fryč <[hidden email]> wrote:
I know there already  is strong agreement, but my $0.02:

I'm not convinced about AGJS and connection with server-side libraries.


I feel like AGIOS, AGDROID, AGCORDOVA, AGJS are trackers for client-side libs,

AGPUSH, AGSYNC, are trackes for server-side technologies,


consider this use case: if we build eventually a new server-side Swift node-sender library, we won't track it under AGIOS because Swift comes from iOS land.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]> wrote:
word up👍


On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Daniel Bevenius <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 Sounds good

On 15 July 2015 at 22:52, Daniel Passos <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Oliveira <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 makes more sense

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Luke Holmquist <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello all,

we've decided that it would probably be a good idea to move JIRA's related to the node-sender to the AG-JS JIRA instead of having them on the AGUSH JIRA.

i think this makes a bit more sense since this a javascript component.

I've started to move open JIRA's over.  i think i'll probably just leave the existing JIRA's where they are, unless someone feels strongly.


I've also started to create some "component" versions similar to the other projects.

the main JS lib will still be just numbers, like 2.3.0,  and for the node-sender we will now have node-sender-0.8.0, for example


-Luke

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
-- Passos

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Sent from Gmail Mobile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] AG JS JIRA

Luke Holmquist
In reply to this post by Lukas Fryc


On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Lukáš Fryč <[hidden email]> wrote:
I know there already  is strong agreement, but my $0.02:

I'm not convinced about AGJS and connection with server-side libraries.


I feel like AGIOS, AGDROID, AGCORDOVA, AGJS are trackers for client-side libs,

I agree with you,  but i think AGJS has might be evolving from just a client side lib.  This is whole topic could be and should be a whole other thread.  I think the original goal of the JS lib has changed and doesn't have as clear of a "story" as the other libraries anymore.

I think that is one of the reasons for this change.   Even though the node-sender is contacting server technologies,  it still is Javascript.  Perhaps thats what AG-JS will evolve into, all JS related things from AeroGear 

AGPUSH, AGSYNC, are trackes for server-side technologies,
I think for AGSync we have related JIRA's pointing to JIRA's in AG-JS.   I thought about doing something like that for the node-sender stuff 


consider this use case: if we build eventually a new server-side Swift node-sender library, we won't track it under AGIOS because Swift comes from iOS land.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]> wrote:
word up👍


On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Daniel Bevenius <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 Sounds good

On 15 July 2015 at 22:52, Daniel Passos <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Oliveira <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 makes more sense

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Luke Holmquist <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello all,

we've decided that it would probably be a good idea to move JIRA's related to the node-sender to the AG-JS JIRA instead of having them on the AGUSH JIRA.

i think this makes a bit more sense since this a javascript component.

I've started to move open JIRA's over.  i think i'll probably just leave the existing JIRA's where they are, unless someone feels strongly.


I've also started to create some "component" versions similar to the other projects.

the main JS lib will still be just numbers, like 2.3.0,  and for the node-sender we will now have node-sender-0.8.0, for example


-Luke

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
-- Passos

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Sent from Gmail Mobile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [aerogear-dev] AG JS JIRA

Luke Holmquist
In reply to this post by Matthias Wessendorf


On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]> wrote:
well... the use of components makes it easy - and for versions we could even do something like, for instance in AGJS

node-1.2.0
store-0.7.0

i think for the JS library,  we would only version components that lived in there own repo.  the node sender makes sense here.  but store(and other components of the main lib) probably wouldn't get this type of granularity,  and at this point, i don't think it makes sense to split them apart 

etc



On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Lukáš Fryč <[hidden email]> wrote:
I know there already  is strong agreement, but my $0.02:

I'm not convinced about AGJS and connection with server-side libraries.


I feel like AGIOS, AGDROID, AGCORDOVA, AGJS are trackers for client-side libs,

AGPUSH, AGSYNC, are trackes for server-side technologies,


consider this use case: if we build eventually a new server-side Swift node-sender library, we won't track it under AGIOS because Swift comes from iOS land.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <[hidden email]> wrote:
word up👍


On Thursday, July 16, 2015, Daniel Bevenius <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 Sounds good

On 15 July 2015 at 22:52, Daniel Passos <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Bruno Oliveira <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1 makes more sense

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Luke Holmquist <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello all,

we've decided that it would probably be a good idea to move JIRA's related to the node-sender to the AG-JS JIRA instead of having them on the AGUSH JIRA.

i think this makes a bit more sense since this a javascript component.

I've started to move open JIRA's over.  i think i'll probably just leave the existing JIRA's where they are, unless someone feels strongly.


I've also started to create some "component" versions similar to the other projects.

the main JS lib will still be just numbers, like 2.3.0,  and for the node-sender we will now have node-sender-0.8.0, for example


-Luke

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
-- Passos

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Sent from Gmail Mobile

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev